MEK'S POPULARITY AMONG IRANIAN YOUTH, REGIME'S NIGHTMARE

I have not seen Iran for 20 years. I remember that when I was 10, I left Iran. It was my dream to go back my homeland but it was depended on regime change.
 When it comes to changing the clerical regime, some people to become active that there is no future for Iran if we want to change the regime. Everything will be ruined and nothing can be under controlled. Fear of this matter convinces me regime change is a bad idea that this is a for good. Until one day, I met a friend who invited me PMOI rally in France. I came up with a lot of insistence on going to Meeting with him. There, when I encountered by some facts that I did not know before it made me proud, some people exist to fight for regime change. However, this question always raises awareness in my mind, a question is about whether the MEK could be able a changing force in Iran. Is it possible a woman restore the trust of the nation betrayed by the clerical regime? After that meeting, I was curious about them. I was trying to get more information about them.When I read an article on a site than I realized about the facts I was not aware of it, and I understood why some people were always trying to scare me of regime change.

 Written by Poorang Novak 

CONTRARY TO IRAN LOBBY CLAIMS, REGIME CHANGE DOES NOT END IN WAR

One of the great falsehoods of the Iran lobby and the appeasers of the clerical regime in Tehran is that any effort at regime change would inevitably lead to war. This by-line can be seen in every article by the Iran lobby and the appeasers attempting to underscore the growing global support for the Iranian opposition (MEK/PMOI) and the Iranian people’s quest for regime change.

History teaches us though that the longevity of any regime born out of violent conquest is ultimately short-lived.

The Iranian regime that was born out of a revolution overthrowing the Shah, which was in turn hijacked by the mullahs and turned into a religious oligarchy. The original aim of the revolution was the formation of a secular, pluralistic democracy. That dream still exists in the hearts and minds of the overwhelming majority of the Iranian people and resonates in the various forms of protest in Iran, despite the repressive measures by the regime. Therefore, the call for “regime change” is primarily the Iranian people’s demand.

Since the early days of the 1979 revolution, the mullahs have relied on the typical tools of oppression to keep their grip on power, including the creation of a paramilitary and judiciary system so vast, it touches nearly every sector of Iranian society. At the same time, the Iranian regime and its apparatus (including the regime lobbies and appeasers) have been quick in attacking any publication or personalities who dare to speak about the Iranian people’s quest for freedom and particularly “regime change” in Iran. It goes without saying that those more in line with the regime have targeted MEK/PMOI since MEK/PMOI is the most dedicated and the organized opposition with extensive routes and support at home, that can materialize the regime change. The People's Mojahedin Organization of Iran, PMOI (usually referred to as MEK) has therefore been the subject of dubious propaganda campaigns by the Ministry of Intelligence and Security (MOIS) at home and by the regime lobbies and appeasers abroad. The idea is to say that there is no democratic alternative to this regime. Hence, the only option is to put up with the dictatorship in Iran, otherwise, there will be war! if you want to be read more please click here.

REGIME CHANGE IN IRAN AT REACH WITH THE ONLY ORGANIZED OPPOSITION (PMOI/MEK)

It is always after hearing that it is being asked to regime change in Iran. My mind is involved in the issue of who will be entitled to the replacement of the mullahs in Iran after the fall of the clerical regime.  Sometimes it is feared that chaos may arise after the regime's overthrow in Iran. Fearing this, I always preferred the same rule to be better. Despite the fact that I knew the regime is a criminal government. Until I encountered an article on the site, I was convinced by reading that there was a substitution after the regime's overthrow. I was pleased and welcomed by the fact that I saw that our future will be granted by this group.

INU - When confronted with the question of whether the Trump administrations back regime change in Iran, Secretary of State Rex Tillerson said Washington would work with Iranian opposition groups to reach “peaceful transition of that government.”

The most organized and renowned Iranian opposition group is none other than the National Council of Resistance of Iran (NCRI) with the People's Mojahedin Organization of Iran (PMOI/MEK) being the core member of this coalition.

The MEK enjoys vast support both inside Iran and abroad, especially an unmatched network of activists who dare to show their support for NCRI President Maryam Rajavi and her movement at whatever opportunity.

Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) echoed Tillerson’s view, saying “it’s time the Iranian people had a free and open society and a functioning democracy,” effectively a call for regime change.

Just months ago Senator McCain paid a visit to Albania where most MEK members are currently stationed after a long ordeal in Iraq. The MEK was the target of numerous attacks by Iran-backed proxy groups and even the government of former Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki prior to their departure to this country in 2016.

On July 1, a major convention was held in Paris where hundreds of political dignitaries from across the globe explicitly called for regime change in Iran and supporting the NCRI and MEK.

The MEK’s vast popular base was proven as over 100,000 members of the Iranian Diaspora rushed to Paris to express their support for Maryam Rajavi, the MEK and a free and democratic Iran.

Trump allies, including John Bolton, former U.S. ambassador to the United Nations during the George W. Bush administration were present and voiced their support for the convention’s cause.

“There is a viable opposition to the rule of the ayatollahs, and that opposition is centered in this room today. I had said for over 10 years since coming to these events, that the declared policy of the United States of America should be … to change the regime itself. And that’s why, before 2019, we here will celebrate in Tehran!”

We are currently at a period of analysis as the President’s National Security Council reviews Washington’s Iran policy.

The best and most realistic option before the Trump administration is supporting the pro-democracy coalition of dissidents, the NCRI, which is best able to mobilize other opposition groups into an even broader coalition. This, coupled with the MEK’s vast domestic network inside Iran, pose a major threat to the ruling regime in Tehran.

In his visit to Riyadh, President Trump also expressed strong views about extremist groups, sending a stark message to those supporting such entities.

“Drive them out of your places of worship,” Trump said of extremists, “drive them out of your holy land. Drive them out of this earth.”

After the July 1 convention in Paris, reports seen the next day indicated Trump might defy Tehran by signaling his willingness to consider supporting the Iranian opposition.

Iranian people and their resistance, with the NCRI and MEK at the helm, will bring about the “regime change from within.” And that is where U.S. and international support will help.

Washington benefits from aligning with the Iranian opposition NCRI and MEK because this resistance is seeking regime change to bring about democracy and freedom for the Iranian people and the region, and merely peace and security for the whole world by rooting out the central exporter of terrorism and Islamic extremism. Which is the religious fascism ruling Iran?

Thus, President Trump has before him the option of reaching out to the Iranian opposition during his review of Iran policy. read more about MEK click here

Not necessary to put war back on the table; Iran is at war

It was hard for me to believe that the Mullahs to keep his commitment to the nuclear agreement and I thought the Mullahs going to do undermine the agreement because for 38 years they are playing with the world. If MEK did not dispose of information about nuclear in Iran, I am sure of that, the Mullahs had nuclear in his hands. I think for that reason the word owe an excuse to P.M.O.I.

I could not find any logical reason to understand that why regime Iran do not tear that agreement because if they think in the balance of power they are strong enough. They should show themselves something else or to show the world their powers but their reaction is very weak, as we know their reaction always is someone like a bully but nowadays they are trying to stick to the nuclear agreement until I read the article as you see.

 by: Hamid Bahrami 

Two years have passed since the signing of the ineffective nuclear agreement between world powers and Tehran, officially known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA).

For those who are familiar with the theocracy in Iran, it is a known fact that all foreign policy in Iran is decided by the Supreme Leader, Ali Khamenei. This is even true in the case of the highly promoted nuclear deal. It is worth noting that before and during the negotiations, Khamenei, said that Oman had a key role in breaking the ice between Iran and the US.

Thus, it is naive to think that the new president, Hassan Rouhani, was the one who changed the 10-year-long stalemate. Iran has an abundance of oil, gas, and others natural resources, hence, using nuclear energy is both expensive and controversial.

Independent experts acknowledge that Iran’s goal of maintaining a nuclear program is to produce the nuclear weapon. However, Iran has consistently refused these views and claims that its program is of a peaceful nature.

Regional hegemony

It is worth pointing out that having a nuclear warhead will guarantee Iran’s regional hegemony. Therefore, Iran has consistently tried to achieve it. Hashemi Rafsanjani, the former Iranian president and one of the pillars of the Islamic Republic who died last year, said that Iran was trying to make the nuclear bomb. read more please click here

Iran nuclear deal anniversary marks a new global focus on the Islamic Republic

it is democratic plan and fair.

when (JCPOA) had signed by 5+1, I thought everything will be okay and I was very optimistic about that deal. I thought Mullahs regime in Iran going to do this commitment as written in the deal. I was optimistic about MiddleEast too because I thought if Mullahs regime back off from nuclear program the peace come back to MiddleEast but by The measures taken by the regime about firing missiles, as well as the regime's involvement in the region, made it clear that this was a dream and I became hopeless and I lost my hope till I saw an article in the Hill which representative congress in the USA and gain my hope again . in Paris was a convention by MEK and10 point plan was provided by Mrs. Maryam Rajavi and the National Council of Resistance NCRI has approved and it is a very democratic plan and fair.




BY SIR DAVID AMESS MP, OPINION CONTRIBUTOR - 07/21/17 06:00 PM EDT

This month marks the second anniversary of the conclusion of the nuclear negotiations between Iran and the permanent members of the UN Security Council. The parties involved now have an opportunity to review the effectiveness of the deal and how well it serves their interests. Iran’s aggressive behavior sharpens the focus on whether the deal is going well. 

It is becoming evident that the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) has been a rather ineffectual agreement. The deal gave the Islamic Republic tens of billions of dollars worth of sanctions relief and asked for little or nothing in return. to read more please click here....

FORMER INTELLIGENCE MINISTER TALKS ABOUT 1988 MASSACRE OF MEK PRISONERS IN IRAN

The cat is out of the bag

Let us pay tribute to great martyrs of PMOI and Who breakthrough of the battle against Khamenei and sacrifice their lives for our freedom.

I thought of the moment by reading an interview. I remembered when I was 7 years old. I saw my mom was crying and screaming that day, I had not seen her before like that. I asked why she cried and she said that they executed him. I asked whom and she said your uncle. I was too young and did not understand exactly what happened and why my mom is so upset and as this scene always annoyed me until I became older. I asked myself much time why they executed my uncle. Every year we have ceremony about his death, ultimately these questions come to my mind, why he was taken away from us. When I got older, I realized that he was a supporter of the MEK and that was the reason they executed him just for the same offense. It was not believable to me that they had been executed for his support of the PMOI organization. After I became older, I realized that on that day, he was not executed along in Iran but Over 30,000 innocent people were executed along with him during several days. This matter always kept my mind busy what was happening that year and nobody knew about it. A few days ago, I saw an interview in media that interview was held with Ali Fallahian, a former Intelligence Minister of Iran, He was a minister of intelligent at that time, he said something nobody heard of it before and nobody had not allow to speak about that thing happened in 1988. Finally, the cat is out of the bag and I find out the key to mastery.

 Published: 18 July 2017

By INU Staff

INU - Ali Fallahian, a former Intelligence Minister of Iran, participated in an interview with Tarikh Online – a state-affiliated news website, earlier this month. He admitted that the Supreme Leader at the time, Ayatollah Khomeini, ordered the execution of anyone linked to the Iranian opposition (MEK) in a fatwa in 1988.to read more please click here...