دیدگاه: جان بولتون برای آمریکا خوب و برای ایران بد است

مجاهدین خلق همواره در رابطه با سخت گیری نکردن در رابطه با رژیم آخوندی هشداردادند
 و از تکرار سیاست غلط که همان سیاست مماشات باشد دولت های غربی را پرهیز دادند من یادم است که یکبار
:خانم مریم رجوی گفتند ‌
 دخالت رژیم در خاورمیانه و صدور تروریزم او صدها بار بدتر از اتمی شدن  رژیم آخوندی میباشد وگوتاه آمدن از اتمی ما به ازا به او دست باز داده شد که در خاورمیانه دخالت کند با گذشت زمان به این اشتباه فاحش که باعث درد و رنچ مردم سوریه و عراق و لبنان و یمن شده با آمدن آقای جان بولتن و ایستادن جلوی این سیاست تجاوزکارانه ایران در منطقه رژیم ایران بایستی یکبار دیگر به عواقب سیاست مداخله جویانه درکشورهای همسایه فکر کند آقای آدام ارلی در باره سیاست غلط نکاتی را گفتند که خوب است دنبال کنید

یادداشتی در وبسایت نشریه «تاون هال» از ادم ارلی، سفیر پیشین آمریکا در بحرین و معاون سخنگوی وزارت خارجه دولت جرج بوش

لفاظی های برآمده از تهران نشان می دهد که انتصاب جان بولتون به عنوان مشاور امنیت ملی جدید پرزیدنت ترامپ بدترین اتفاقی است که تا کنون (برای ایران) اتفاق افتاده است.

اعتراضات اخیر در ایران منطق انتخاب جان بولتون را اعتبار می بخشد. اگر ایران فکر می کند او بد است، حتما باید خوب باشد. یک چیز قطعی است: ایالات متحده دیگر سیاست مماشات با جمهوری اسلامی ایران را دنبال نمی کند.

سیاستگذاران آمریکا از سال ۲۰۰۸ در مسیر همراهی با ملاها در تهران حرکت کردند. تصمیم پرزیدنت اوباما به ترک عراق آن کشور را تحویل ایران داد. تسلیم اوباما در سوریه به ایران و روسیه اجازه داد اسد را در قدرت حفظ کرده و صدها هزار سوری را بی محابا و بدون مجازات قتل عام کنند. لغو تحریم ها در قالب توافق هسته ای ۱۵۰ میلیارد دلار در جیب رهبران ایرانی قرار داد که برای تامین تروریست های سپاه پاسداران و حمایت از گروه های دست نشانده در لبنان، یمن و بحرین استفاده می شود.

بغض در آسمان خاکی                         

لحظاتم و نگرانیم را در آن سال به یاد میآورم که همواره ذهنم درگیر این موضوع بود که بین رژيم ایران و دولت عراق چه معامله ای صورت گرفته که به شکلی میخواهند از دست مجاهدین خلق در عراق خلاص شوند و فکر نمیکردم که مجاهدین بتوانند با دست خالی جلوی ارتش زرهی عراق بایستند و فکر میکردم که کار مجاهدین تمام است ولی برعکس مقامتهائی که از خود بارز کردند فهمیدم که آنها را خیلی دست کم گرفته بودیم بهتر است که حوادث آن روز را از روایت های خودشان بشنویم........

دیروز هوا ابری بود و رگبارهای تند روزهای پایانی اردیبهشت، آسمان اشرف را هاشور می‌زدند. آه! مدتی بود بوی خاک باران خوردهٔ شهر محبوبم را نفس نکشیده بودم... امروز ولی، آسمان چون کرباس پاره پارهٴ خاکستری است و مه ـ خاکی سنگین، ساکت و گرم، بالای گیسوان سبز اکالیپتوس‌ها، شناور. آب و هوای اشرف، مثل آدم‌های آن، دائم در تلاطم است و بیگانه با سکون. جالب این‌که گاه در همان روزی که باران می‌آید، همزمان، خاکیپودرمانند نیز پیدایش می‌شود و در همه چیز نفوذ می‌کند و از همه چیز می‌گذرد. با این همه اشرف؛ اشرف مجروح، اشرف جنگی و دوست داشتنی، حتی در زیر چتری عظیم از خاک، باز هم زیباست، زیباتر از هر شهری که در جهان دیده‌ یا در رؤیا، آرزوی دیدنش را داشته‌ام.

از آن جمعهٴ خونین [19فروردین را می‌گویم] تاکنون، نتوانسته و فرصت نکرده بودم میدان آزادی، دریاچهٴ نور، پارک، امجدیه، کتابخانه، و ساختمانهای موسوم به «فرماندهی اشرف» را ببینم و مشتاق بودم ببینم چطور خاکریزدژآسای نیروهای مالکی ـ بعد از مقاومت جانانهٴ خواهران مجاهد ـ آنجا را دور زده، و نتوانسته این قسمت را ـ که کلکسیون زیبایی‌هاست ـ از اشرف جدا کند.

بغض در آسمان خاکی

خامنه‌ای در پشت فیلترینگ شبکه‌های اجتماعی!

             خامنه‌ای در پشت فیلترینگ شبکه‌های اجتماعی!

در وحشت از سرنگونی و آگاهی توده ها و علیرغم ادعای رژیم آخوندی در باره آزادی یک مشت حرف بی پایه اساس از دهان ولی فقیه درمانده گفته شده درواقع با خواندن این مقاله یک آگاهی نسبی نسبت به اهداف فیلرینگ و اینکه چه کسی پشت آن است را نشان میدهد مقاله را لطفا دنبال کنید.

هفته گذشته علاءالدین بروجردی، رئیس کمیسیون امنیت در مجلس حکومتی از«تصمیم بالاترین» سطح نظام برای فیلترینگ شبکه تلگرام در ایران خبر داده بود.

ترجمان این جملات به معنای دخالت مستقیم شخص ولی‌فقیه برای سانسور شبکه‌های اجتماعی به‌ویژه از فردای قیام مردم در دیماه گذشته می‌باشد. دیکتاتوری ولی‌فقیه که خوبی بر نقش بلامنازع شبکه‌های اجتماعی و رساندن پیام مقاومت

، مجاهدین و مردم به جان آمده برای تغییر و دگرگونی در ایران آگاه است، بر این منطق با تمامی باندهای حکومتی تلاش دارد تا هرچه بیشتر و گسترده‌تر به سیاست مسدود نمودن منافذ و کانال‌های خبررسانی که بنا برداده های رژیم بالغ بر ۴۰ میلیون کاربردارند، دست یابد.

ابعاد این وضعیت بحرانی که به‌واقع نقض پایه‌ای‌ترین و منطقی‌ترین حقوق انسانی در دیکتاتوری ولی‌فقیه می‌باشد، به حدی است که حتی باندهای متخاصم در درون رژیم را نیز بر سر «چرائئ» آن به جان یکدیگر انداخته است.
درحالیکه باند روحانی شیادانه تلاش دارد تا بستن شبکه‌های اجتماعی مانند تلگرام را ضربه‌ای به وضعیت اقتصادی و بحرانی رژیم تلقی نماید که در پی آن قریب «۲۰۰ هزار شغل» به خطر خواهد افتاد، باند مقابل موضوع را اساسا «امنیتی» دانسته و نسبت به تبعات مخرب 

ANALYSIS: How to tackle Iran’s Middle East bellicosity

Missing link

 I am an Iranian. I am always worried about the situation in Iran and the Middle East. I afraid that there will be another unwanted war like Iraq in the region. I know that it will only harm the Iranian people.  I also know that fear of the existence of the war should not be the reason of prolonging the life of the clerical regime. I also know that it is a new policy that the US government has adopted on the clerical regime.
indeed when Obama was President by that appeasement policy. it was the main reason for interference in the region by Mullahs regime. He pursued an appeasement policy with the Mullahs regime and gave them open hands for importing terrorism in the region.
But with the new presidency, the policy of appeasement with the Iranian regime has been replaced by a tough policy that to force the clerical regime to obey international request.
in fact, I welcome to such this policy.
 but my main concern always telling me there is a missing link till I read an article in the site it made me satisfy and not to worry about Iran after Mullahs.

By Heshmat Alavi

Thanks to years of Western appeasement in the face of Iran’s belligerence across the Middle East, evidence of Tehran’s dangerous footprints are now visible in several countries across the region, including even Saudi Arabia’s Eastern Province.

The Trump administration, however, has made it quite vivid its adoption of a firm approach. This stance, signaled in the historic May conference in Riyadh, is long overdue and should be enhanced by Washington supporting the Iranian people’s desire for regime change.

A history of devastation

Iran has a long record of hostility against neighboring countries and US interests in the Middle East. The 1983 bombings targeting the US Embassy and barracks in Beirut, the Khobar Towers attack in 1996, all climaxed in the support Iran provided for Shiite proxies and the Sunni Taliban in their campaign against US-led coalition forces in Afghanistan and Iraq.

In parallel form, the Lebanese Hezbollah and Hamas, two known terrorist groups, have for over 30 years enjoyed contributions from Tehran to fuel sectarianism throughout the Middle East and carry out terrorist attacks.

The Obama administration handed Iraq over to Iran on a silver plate through a strategic mistake of prematurely pulling out all US troops. This paved the path for Iran to further export its “revolution” through a convenient medium of extremist proxies.

The West can literally be accused of standing aside and watching Iran’s aggressive policy. This has rendered a slate of countries, including Afghanistan, Bahrain, Iraq, Saudi Arabia, Syria and Yemen feel threatened and/or left utterly devastated from Iran’s meddling on their soil.read more click here

Failed Attempts of Iran Regime Against MEK

I was confused about diplomacy between Iran and France.

Since I am an Iranian. I'm trying to pursue some newspaper that links with Iran. recently I see that Iran's diplomacy was very active in France, and I see that much of contracts are being made with French companies and with French foreign policies. 
Although I Know the regime is not satisfied with the global diplomacy because he is getting the strike from that diplomacy as to do limitation about the nuclear bomb and imposing the new sanction on Iran. but I could not understand why and what is reason Iran diplomacy trying to stick with France.  
In this regard, Iran has tried to give all economic privileges to France. I paid a lot of attention to these deals that were closed between the Iranian and French regimes, and I saw even less than 30 percent of the benefits in the pockets of Rouhani's government. I was confused and I was trying to find out a relation to those deals between Rouhani's government and France and I know that something going on behind curtain till I have read an article on internet and me understood what is happening around.

London, 2 Aug - Mere hours before the Iranian Resistance’s annual Free Iran gathering began in Paris, the Iranian Regime’s foreign minister, Javad Zarif, visited France in order to ban the gathering.

He failed. Over 100,000 people turned up to support the Iranian people’s call for freedom.

Three weeks later, Iran’s Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei sent his close relative and advisor, Kamal Kharrazi, who was involved in a failed 2003 plot to discredit the resistance group the People's Mojahedin Organization of Iran (MEK/PMOI), to denounce the MEK/PMOI as "a terrorist group that murdered thousands of ordinary citizens in Iran".

This is, of course, a complete lie, but when your daily activities include running a terrorist training camp, murdering political prisoners, and illegally continuing work on your nuclear program, what’s a little lying? read more...

MEK'S POPULARITY AMONG IRANIAN YOUTH, REGIME'S NIGHTMARE

I have not seen Iran for 20 years. I remember that when I was 10, I left Iran. It was my dream to go back my homeland but it was depended on regime change.
 When it comes to changing the clerical regime, some people to become active that there is no future for Iran if we want to change the regime. Everything will be ruined and nothing can be under controlled. Fear of this matter convinces me regime change is a bad idea that this is a for good. Until one day, I met a friend who invited me PMOI rally in France. I came up with a lot of insistence on going to Meeting with him. There, when I encountered by some facts that I did not know before it made me proud, some people exist to fight for regime change. However, this question always raises awareness in my mind, a question is about whether the MEK could be able a changing force in Iran. Is it possible a woman restore the trust of the nation betrayed by the clerical regime? After that meeting, I was curious about them. I was trying to get more information about them.When I read an article on a site than I realized about the facts I was not aware of it, and I understood why some people were always trying to scare me of regime change.

 Written by Poorang Novak 

CONTRARY TO IRAN LOBBY CLAIMS, REGIME CHANGE DOES NOT END IN WAR

One of the great falsehoods of the Iran lobby and the appeasers of the clerical regime in Tehran is that any effort at regime change would inevitably lead to war. This by-line can be seen in every article by the Iran lobby and the appeasers attempting to underscore the growing global support for the Iranian opposition (MEK/PMOI) and the Iranian people’s quest for regime change.

History teaches us though that the longevity of any regime born out of violent conquest is ultimately short-lived.

The Iranian regime that was born out of a revolution overthrowing the Shah, which was in turn hijacked by the mullahs and turned into a religious oligarchy. The original aim of the revolution was the formation of a secular, pluralistic democracy. That dream still exists in the hearts and minds of the overwhelming majority of the Iranian people and resonates in the various forms of protest in Iran, despite the repressive measures by the regime. Therefore, the call for “regime change” is primarily the Iranian people’s demand.

Since the early days of the 1979 revolution, the mullahs have relied on the typical tools of oppression to keep their grip on power, including the creation of a paramilitary and judiciary system so vast, it touches nearly every sector of Iranian society. At the same time, the Iranian regime and its apparatus (including the regime lobbies and appeasers) have been quick in attacking any publication or personalities who dare to speak about the Iranian people’s quest for freedom and particularly “regime change” in Iran. It goes without saying that those more in line with the regime have targeted MEK/PMOI since MEK/PMOI is the most dedicated and the organized opposition with extensive routes and support at home, that can materialize the regime change. The People's Mojahedin Organization of Iran, PMOI (usually referred to as MEK) has therefore been the subject of dubious propaganda campaigns by the Ministry of Intelligence and Security (MOIS) at home and by the regime lobbies and appeasers abroad. The idea is to say that there is no democratic alternative to this regime. Hence, the only option is to put up with the dictatorship in Iran, otherwise, there will be war! if you want to be read more please click here.

REGIME CHANGE IN IRAN AT REACH WITH THE ONLY ORGANIZED OPPOSITION (PMOI/MEK)

It is always after hearing that it is being asked to regime change in Iran. My mind is involved in the issue of who will be entitled to the replacement of the mullahs in Iran after the fall of the clerical regime.  Sometimes it is feared that chaos may arise after the regime's overthrow in Iran. Fearing this, I always preferred the same rule to be better. Despite the fact that I knew the regime is a criminal government. Until I encountered an article on the site, I was convinced by reading that there was a substitution after the regime's overthrow. I was pleased and welcomed by the fact that I saw that our future will be granted by this group.

INU - When confronted with the question of whether the Trump administrations back regime change in Iran, Secretary of State Rex Tillerson said Washington would work with Iranian opposition groups to reach “peaceful transition of that government.”

The most organized and renowned Iranian opposition group is none other than the National Council of Resistance of Iran (NCRI) with the People's Mojahedin Organization of Iran (PMOI/MEK) being the core member of this coalition.

The MEK enjoys vast support both inside Iran and abroad, especially an unmatched network of activists who dare to show their support for NCRI President Maryam Rajavi and her movement at whatever opportunity.

Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) echoed Tillerson’s view, saying “it’s time the Iranian people had a free and open society and a functioning democracy,” effectively a call for regime change.

Just months ago Senator McCain paid a visit to Albania where most MEK members are currently stationed after a long ordeal in Iraq. The MEK was the target of numerous attacks by Iran-backed proxy groups and even the government of former Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki prior to their departure to this country in 2016.

On July 1, a major convention was held in Paris where hundreds of political dignitaries from across the globe explicitly called for regime change in Iran and supporting the NCRI and MEK.

The MEK’s vast popular base was proven as over 100,000 members of the Iranian Diaspora rushed to Paris to express their support for Maryam Rajavi, the MEK and a free and democratic Iran.

Trump allies, including John Bolton, former U.S. ambassador to the United Nations during the George W. Bush administration were present and voiced their support for the convention’s cause.

“There is a viable opposition to the rule of the ayatollahs, and that opposition is centered in this room today. I had said for over 10 years since coming to these events, that the declared policy of the United States of America should be … to change the regime itself. And that’s why, before 2019, we here will celebrate in Tehran!”

We are currently at a period of analysis as the President’s National Security Council reviews Washington’s Iran policy.

The best and most realistic option before the Trump administration is supporting the pro-democracy coalition of dissidents, the NCRI, which is best able to mobilize other opposition groups into an even broader coalition. This, coupled with the MEK’s vast domestic network inside Iran, pose a major threat to the ruling regime in Tehran.

In his visit to Riyadh, President Trump also expressed strong views about extremist groups, sending a stark message to those supporting such entities.

“Drive them out of your places of worship,” Trump said of extremists, “drive them out of your holy land. Drive them out of this earth.”

After the July 1 convention in Paris, reports seen the next day indicated Trump might defy Tehran by signaling his willingness to consider supporting the Iranian opposition.

Iranian people and their resistance, with the NCRI and MEK at the helm, will bring about the “regime change from within.” And that is where U.S. and international support will help.

Washington benefits from aligning with the Iranian opposition NCRI and MEK because this resistance is seeking regime change to bring about democracy and freedom for the Iranian people and the region, and merely peace and security for the whole world by rooting out the central exporter of terrorism and Islamic extremism. Which is the religious fascism ruling Iran?

Thus, President Trump has before him the option of reaching out to the Iranian opposition during his review of Iran policy. read more about MEK click here